Do You Remember January 3, 2007… |
| February 2nd, 2012 under Uncategorized. [ Comments: none ]
…Five Years On?
This message has been making the rounds of the Internet. While the original author is unknown, the timeline and the facts are accurate and easily verified. Please email, tweet, post on Facebook or on your own blog!
This is just a history lesson. I am sending it to all regardless of party. It is history and nothing can change it. All Americans should pass this on to everyone in their database. Both parties need to cut expenses, both parties have some blame, but this is truly what happened and Americans need to wake up and take our country back in 2012!!
REMEMBER JAN. 3, 2007
The day the Democrats took over was not January 22nd 2009, it was January 3rd 2007, the day the Democrats took over the House of Representatives and the Senate, the start of the 110th Congress. The Democratic Party gained a majority in both chambers for the first time since the end of the 103rd Congress in 1995.
For those who are listening to the liberals propagating the fallacy that everything is "Bush’s Fault," think about this:
January 3rd, 2007, the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the Congress:
- The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77
- The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5%
- The Unemployment rate was 4.6%
- George Bush’s Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB CREATION!
Remember that day…
January 3rd, 2007 was the day that Barney Frank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee.
The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy?
BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES!
THANK YOU DEMOCRATS (especially Barney) for taking us from 13,000 DOW, 3.5% GDP and 4.6% Unemployment…to this CRISIS by (among MANY other things) dumping 5-6 TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans on the economy from YOUR Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac FIASCOES!
(BTW: Bush asked Congress 17 times to stop Fannie & Freddie – starting in 2001 because it was financially risky for the US economy). Barney blocked it and called it a "Chicken Little Philosophy" (and the sky did fall!)
And who took the THIRD highest pay-off from Fannie Mae AND Freddie Mac? OBAMA And who fought against reform of Fannie and Freddie?
and the Democrat Congress, especially BARNEY!!!!
So when someone tries to blame Bush…
REMEMBER JANUARY 3rd, 2007…THE DAY THE DEMOCRATS TOOK OVER!
Bush may have been in the car but the Democrats were in charge of the gas pedal and steering wheel they were driving the economy into the ditch.
Budgets do not come from the White House. They come from Congress and the party that controlled Congress since January 2007 is the Democratic Party. Furthermore, the Democrats controlled the budget process for 2008 & 2009 as well as 2010 & 2011.
In that first year, they had to contend with George Bush, which caused them to compromise on spending, when Bush somewhat belatedly got tough on spending increases. Bush should have vetoed every bill that came in front of his desk! For 2009 though, Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely, passing continuing resolutions to keep government running until Barack Obama could take office. At that time, they passed a massive omnibus spending bill to complete the 2009 budget.
And where was Barack Obama during this time? He was a member of that very Congress that passed all of these massive spending bills, and he signed the omnibus bill as President to complete 2009. Let’s remember what the deficits looked like during that period:
If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets. That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending. After that, Democrats in Congress took control of spending, and that includes Barack Obama, who voted for the budgets.
If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself.
In a nutshell, what Obama is saying is, "I inherited a deficit that I voted for, And then I voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January 20th, 2009."
There is no way this will be widely publicized unless each of us passes it on.
"The problems we face today exist because the people who WORK for a living are outnumbered by those who VOTE for a living."
Cops: We wanna use GPS without a warrant! |
| June 27th, 2011 under 4th Amdendment, Big Brother, Government, Police State, Totalitarianism. [ Comments: 1 ]
This one is a bit hard, I can see valid arguments on both sides of the issue. On the one hand, tracking a ne’er-do-well via some sort of GPS tracking device isn’t much farther of a step, really, than putting a tail on them. Having some officer tasked with following the suspect where ever they go, making note of what they do.
On the other hand, warrantless tracking of citizens seems so…totalitarian. I’m watching this one, since they are talking about forcing the automotive equivalent to a ‘black box’ into all new cars. A device that will record each and every location one visits, and the speed they took to get there. It’s horribly intrusive, and the potential for abuse by the police is HUGE. Insurance companies would love that too, as they’d be able to grab that info, and say “you know, Mr. Smith, you consistently travel over the speed limit, and even though you have no tickets, and have never had an accident, we’re going to raise your rates.”
On second thought, screw the first part. The government doesn’t need to be tracking us, for any reason, anytime, anywhere, period. If they have probable cause, they can get a warrant, just like it used to be for wiretaps…until that blasted (un)Patriot Act was started.
read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/27/idUSN1E75Q0PY20110627
Clinton to Congress: “"Whose side are you on?" |
| June 23rd, 2011 under Barack Hussein Obama, Hillary Clinton, Libya, Military. [ Comments: none ]
Republicans are looking to vote on two measures soon. The first to give Obama the authority to have the military carry out their operation in Libya. The other to strip funding for the operation, thus ending our involvement in the ongoing civil war.
Hillary Clinton is miffed because she claims intervening in Libya was the correct thing to do, and indeed it was as far as I’m concerned. Congress, on the other hand, feels snubbed because Obama didn’t get permission first. The War Powers Act gives the president a 90 day window in which he can send troops into a ‘hostilities’ without having to get approval of Congress. After that 90 day window, he’s got to either pull the troops back, or go to Congress, hat in hand, and ask their consent to go longer.
The 90 days expired last week for Obama and the Libyan operation, and he refuses to ask Congress for permission to keep going. Now, don’t get me wrong, I don’t see that Congress would have told him ‘no’. I fully believe our elected officials would have supported the action, and given the go-ahead. But Obama won’t ask for it. Why? Who the hell knows. Perhaps he sees it as beneath him to have to follow the law.
So see, Hillary, doesn’t matter if the action is right or wrong, that’s not at issue here. What is at issue is, do we let a president ignore the law of the land? Do we set a precedent that essentially allows the president (this or the next, or the one after that possibly) to send our troops to any ole place he wants, without any checks & balances from Congress? I would certainly hope not.
Read more: http://apnews.myway.com/article/20110623/D9O1A3VO0.html
Geert Wilders Prevails! |
| June 23rd, 2011 under Censorship, Fitna, Free Speech, Geert Wilders, Islam, Islamification of the West, Netherlands. [ Comments: none ]
It’s not only an acquittal for me, but a victory for freedom of expression in the Netherlands. – Geert Wilders
Wilders came to my attention back on ‘08 with his 15 minute film “Fitna”, and has since (probably before too, but I don’t really know) been somewhat of a crusader against the onslaught of Muslim immigration into the Netherlands all the while expressing that he does not have a problem with Islam, or with Muslims in general, so long as they accept the Dutch values and society, and not try and mold and change it to something they prefer. All of this sounds perfectly reasonable to me, and probably also to most reasonable, thinking Americans.
Of course, this kind of rational thought cannot be expressed without the danger of punishment. The old adage “No good deed goes unpunished” certainly seem to hold true when you’re on the wrong side of political correctness…especially where Muslims are concerned.
So it is a glorious day indeed, where we find that Wilders is exonerated of all charges. Found not guilty, at all, not one iota of guilt. Sadly, the judge did declare that some of what Wilders said and wrote were brushing against the edge of the law. But then, that’s the Netherland’s version of free speech I suppose. Thankfully we don’t have these kind of witch hunts here. We’re free to express our ideas and thoughts without recrimination.
So, in honor of Mr. Wilders, tonight’s beer will be an Amstel!
Read all about it here: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/06/23/dutch-court-acquits-anti-islam-lawmaker/
Who’s afraid of Sarah Palin???? |
| June 9th, 2011 under Elections, Leftists, Media, Politics, Sarah Palin. [ Comments: none ]
If you were to listen to the pundits on talk radio, you’d hear time and time again how nobody believes that Sarah Palin has a snowball’s chance in hell of either 1) winning the nomination, and b) beating Obama in 2012 if by some miracle she did win the nomination.
With her “own side” against her, why are the leftists so worried? I put “own side” in quotes, because really, the entrenched established Republicans are more a part of the problem with our government, than part of the solution. Palin is an outsider, a wild card, and you never know what she’s going to do next. Actually, this isn’t true to those who have followed her since the past presidential race. She reminds me of the old country song that goes where the singer sings about how everyone in the county could count on knowing which side of an issue his father would be on, because he was a stand-up kinda guy. That’s how I see Palin. It’s pretty obvious where she stands, and where she’ll be on most any issue.
With all this, the left is still up in arms about her. Like the Washington Post, who are trying to enlist 100 of their readers to go through Palin’s emails from during her governorship looking for any tiny thread of something to they can maybe put under a magnifying glass and try to hang her with. Can you imagine the outrage from the left if Fox News were to advertise something similar in regards to Pelosi, or Clinton, or even the saintly Obama himself?
One talking head on NPR a few weeks ago said that Palin had erred in that she’s stayed in the limelight pretty much for the last 2.5 years, and that she’s becoming “old hat” so to speak. Personally I think that was a smart move if she plans on running in 2012. Reason being is that in the past few years, pretty much everything scrap of dirt that can be dug up on her, has been. That’s why the comics and columnists are now going after her kids (even the Down’s Syndrome one – SHAME on you!). That’s why the WaPo is now going to such great lengths to find any little thing they can use against her. Any bones in her closet have pretty much already come out, been discussed, hashed, re-hashed and settled.
LGF Commenters Rant on Pam Geller about the Serbs |
| June 6th, 2011 under Uncategorized. [ Comments: none ]
Posted by Julia Gorin
? ? ? UPDATE ? ? ?
The letter by Mr. Edward Spalton (included further down in this blog) was sent out to local British papers and Euro-skeptic political journals, he informs me. Mr. Spalton is Vice Chairman of the Campaign for an Independent Britain, “a cross-party group trying to extricate our country from the European Union,” and he frequently writes on matters relating to Serbia, “as they are part and parcel of the European ‘empire’,” he explains, adding, “I have taken an interest in the Balkans since the early Nineties when I got the feeling that reporting in the mainstream media was very badly skewed – and, boy, was I right!”
The tantrum-prone Charles Johnson, proprietor of the Little Green Footballs blog which was briefly conservative in the immediate post-9/11 era but whose love for Muslims has grown in direct proportion to the pro-Muslim propaganda we’ve been enduring since that day, has a sort of “Geller Watch” in which he tries to paint anti-jihad activist Pamela Geller as a vile nut job. The pitch reaches new levels when she touches on — guess what — the Balkans. Here is what Pamela posted this weekend (original emphasis included), followed by the usual sort of response that LGF does on the topic (look for the ubiquitous buzz phrase to stifle debate — you know what it is — “genocide denier”):
By Pam Geller
Why aren’t the Bosnian Muslims held to the same standard as the Serb Christians? Why is this fabricated narrative protected so fiercely? The left is spitting bullets every time I post on Bosnia. They are so vested in establishing a militant Islamic state in the heart of Europe. Why?
The American people were fed an endless supply of distortions and deceptions in order to grease Clinton’s war. It began with a lie. How long will these human rights activists and international law clowns ignore the Serbian people and their stories? Refuting the Bosnian Lies.
The international community jumped to manufacture a “genocide” of a couple of hundred people, when real genocides like the millions of Armenians, Greeks and Assyrians by the Muslims are systematically ignored, demied [sic]. Enough. When does the truth get a hearing? Scroll here.
This letter in the [Edmonton] Journal speaks truth to lie:
Mladic’s record distorted
Edmonton Journal May 31, 2011
Re: “Mladic trial a time for Balkan truth,” Opinion, May 28.
Thanks for the ambitious headline: “Mladic trial a time for Balkan truth.”
We can only wish that truth were the goal of The Hague.
The Journal says that “Unquestionably, justice is the prime imperative behind the arrest and coming trial of the Balkans’ dreadful Ratko Mladic.”
Using the preface “unquestionably” doesn’t make it unquestionable.
The Journal says that “It is true that in the most passionate of conflicts, nothing will shake some people from false or distorted versions of past events.”
Serbians and the many reputable critics who have witnessed the reporting and trials that came out of these civil wars will firmly support that statement. What is a false version of past events? Could it be that changing the definition of genocide to fit the crime Mladic is accused of is a falsehood?
Thousands of Serbs around Srebrenica were slaughtered, tortured and beheaded by Muslims based in the Srebrenica “safe haven.” There was no question about who did it: Naser Oric, the leader of the killers, photographed his victims and bragged to Western journalists. This man got a light sentence – a slap on the wrist.
Who would believe that Mladic will get a fair trial?
There was never a Serbian plan, much less a Mladic plan, for a greater Serbia, but sloppy reporters, including The Journal, in using those words.
Anybody can pick up a package of past articles written about the conflicts and spit it out again. The Journal coyly states that if Mladic is convicted it will be for specific, verifiable crimes, but he has been convicted again and again in the press until he is finally being sent to this kangaroo court to tie things up.
The Serbian people are a dignified, justice-loving people whose story is ignored.
N. Jakovac, Toronto, Ont.
What the media refuses to report on are the facts.
Deutsche Presse-Agentur June 6, 1996
Senior official admits to secret U.N. report on Sarajevo massacre
For the first time, a senior U.N. official has admitted the existence of a secret U.N. report that blames the Bosnian Moslems for the February 1994 massacre of Moslems at a Sarajevo market.
Yasushi Akashi, the Undersecretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and the former head of the U.N. mission in Bosnia, told the German Press Agency dpa that the secret report is “no secret.”
An international outcry over the massacre, in which 68 civilians perished at Markale marketplace, led directly to a toughening of Western policy towards the Serbs, who were widely blamed for the incident.
But there have been persistent rumours at the United Nations ever since that a U.N. report clearly blamed the Moslems for firing on their own people in order to create international sympathy and get the West to fight on their side against the Serbs.
Until Thursday, U.N. officials strongly denied the report existed, even after it was quoted in press reports.
Akashi told dpa that not only did the first report exist, but that some journalists already had a copy. He said the details were in a 1995 story by U.S. journalist David Binder, who quoted from the confidential report.
According to Binder, the report said U.N. peacekeepers were prevented by Moslem police from entering the site in the aftermath of the explosion. No doctors were allowed on the scene and the 197 victims were carried away to hospital within 25 minutes.
After studying the crater left by the mortar shell and the distribution of the shrapnel, the report concluded that the shell was fired from behind Moslem lines. U.N. monitors reported no Serbian shelling that day from points near the marketplace.
The official U.N. report that was subsequently released said the evidence as to who fired the shell was inconclusive, since it originated from an area where Moslem and Serb lines were very close. The two reports represented divergent views, but the United Nations chose to publish the neutral report and keep the other secret.
The incident led to a NATO ultimatum to Bosnian Serbs to withdraw their heavy weapons from around Sarajevo.
At the time, Madeleine Albright, the U.S. ambassador to the U.N., said: “It’s very hard to believe any country would do this to their own people, and therefore, although we do not exactly know what the facts are, it would seem to us that the Serbs are the ones that probably have a great deal of responsibility.”
CORROBORATED IN THESE 3 CLOSING PARAGRAPHS OF THIS AKI REPORT from Dec. 2007:
Bosnian Serb leaders have claimed that the attack was engineered by Bosnian Muslim forces to lay blame on the Serbs and some UN officials in Bosnia have speculated that it may have been the case.
[Dragomir] Milosevic has argued that Muslim forces were entrenched in Sarajevo from where they shelled Serb positions, thus making the city a “legitimate target”.
Since its founding in 1993, the ICTY has indicted 161 individuals, mostly Serbs….
A source and reader of Pamela’s (Armaros), whom I’ve fought with in her comments section because he’s still a bit brainwashed on the Balkans (but more fair-minded than most), sent her the following email containing Johnson’s post yesterday:
When you call out “genocide denier” no wonder the hate follows. Funny this is what he is claiming to be fighting:
Pamela Geller, Genocide Denier
“…Today, Pamela Geller crossed the line into outright genocide denial, claiming that only a “couple of hundred people” were killed in Srebrenica by Serbian commander Ratko Mladic. The truth, of course, is that Mladic oversaw the massacre of thousands of innocent Muslims — including many children — who had sought safety from the genocide being perpetrated by Serbian forces in other parts of Yugoslavia. And that’s just one of his many documented war crimes.
“And it gets even worse. Geller also claims that Muslim forces fired on their own people to create international sympathy, and that the well-documented attempted genocide by Serbians was completely fabricated.
“Her despicable post supporting the mass murder of Muslims: DISTORTING HISTORY – Atlas Shrugs…”
How can the separating of the men of fighting age and allowing the women and children to join the UN camp [be] genocide? Even if they killed 8000 that would be a serious war crime but not genocide.
Armaros gets it.
And we should thank Pamela for putting herself out there on this, the untouchable subject.
OH, these were two of the comments to the LGF post:
By ‘albusteve’: “Geller has become a demented freak that should be chained to a wall…her reckless fabrications ought to be criminal”
By ‘Summer’: “You know……you’d think that the b—h would learn some day…”
Notice that, like the Muslim world, LGF readers and bloggers don’t seem to believe in free speech. I mean, if Geller should be chained to a wall and all.
Notice something else, a consistent pattern when it comes to the Balkans. It doesn’t matter if the Serb-exculpatory information is coming from a report by an otherwise Serb-hostile UN, or from an AFP dispatch (as in Pamela’s post), or from Amnesty International, HRW, any number of UN generals or officials — or even from more honest members of the designated victim sides. The charge is always the same: “Geller says…” or “Gorin says…” and stuff like ‘These blinded-by-anti-Muslim-hate bitches have lost their marbles.’ I don’t think that Generals Satish Nambiar, Lewis MacKenzie, Philippe Morillon and Mauro Del Vecchio are crazy bitches — as aren’t the Dutch UN battalion or Canadian former ambassador James Bissett, nor the score of non-Gorin, non-Geller columnists who have been trying to call attention to the fallacy of the official Bosnia and Kosovo narratives (on which policy continues to hinge and certain state-building projects are based). What reminded me of the phenomenon in which the people and reports that Pamela or I quote are completely ignored as sources (and instead Pamela and I magically become the only sources of what we’re saying) was the following letter posted at the 1389 blog. I’m in the process of finding out which publication it was intended for and whether it was ultimately published there or not:
The capture of General Ratko Mladic has brought the Balkan situation to the fore again. Very successful EU and NATO propaganda has created an impression in the public mind which is at considerable variance from the facts.
Readers might like to guess which Balkan leaders said or wrote the following:
A. “Genocide is a natural phenomenon in keeping with the human-social and mythological divine nature. It is not only commended but commanded by the Almighty…”
B. “Protect brotherhood and unity…nationalism always means isolation from others, being locked in a closed circle and stopping growth…”
C. “There can be no peace or coexistence between the Islamic faith and non Islamic institutions. The Islamic movement can and must take power as soon as it is morally strong enough, not only to destroy the non Islamic power but to build a new one….”
The answers may surprise.
A. Franjo Tudjman – leader of Croatia, backed by EU/NATO
B. Slobodan Milosevic – Serbian leader branded as “the butcher of the Balkans” by EU/NATO
C. Alija Izetbegovic – Muslim leader of Bosnia, backed by EU/NATO
So it is no surprise that things are not quite as portrayed with General Mladic. Atrocities there certainly were at Srebrenica but on both sides, as testified by the Canadian UN Commander, General Lewis Mackenzie. He states that the Muslim forces used the UN “safe haven” at Srebrenica as a base for murderous attacks against surrounding Serb villages in which thousands of civilians were killed.
So when the Bosnian Serb forces arrived in the town, they were not in a forgiving mood and many murders undoubtedly took place but, as for the claim of 8,000 killed, “the math just doesn’t add up”. Neither does anyone committing genocide allow women and children safe passage -as Mladic’s forces did.
Whilst saying that two wrongs don’t make a right, General MacKenzie believes that the Serbs were fooled into their attack to provide a
pretext for NATO air strikes, rather like those in Libya today.
I received corroboration of General Mackenzie’s view in discussion with James Bissett who was Canadian Ambassador in Yugoslavia at the time.
The Muslim Commander, General Nasir Oric, got off at the Hague tribunal but I doubt whether General Mladic will.
All the facts aside, I’ll ask an obvious question that I’ve asked before: Are we really still supposed to mourn Muslim soldiers? Really?
In closing, to Mr. Spalton’s “Guess Who Said” list, at least three other statements off the top of my head could be added:
D. “One can’t be bothered with prisoners.”
E. “A breach must be made. Kill all that stands in front of you. I am permitting and ordering that the enemies be killed using all necessary means, knives, bombs, hunting knives, teeth.” “Can we rape?” [You have the right to do anything you want.]
F. Serbian women should be used to satisfy potential Albanian rapists.
D. Bosnian-Muslim commander Naser Oric, as paraphrased by UN General Philippe Morillon.
E. Quote and paraphrase of Hamdija Delali?, commander of the V corps’s 502 brigades of the Muslim military, talking to his soldiers in a video, in which he calls for an attack on Serb-aligned Muslim moderate Fikret Abdi?’s area.
F. Paraphrase of leading ethnic Albanian politician in Kosovo, Fadil Hoxha, at an official dinner in 1986.
Islamic triumphalism: Bosnian musical ensemble celebrates ?stanbul’s conquest |
| June 6th, 2011 under Uncategorized. [ Comments: none ]
I’m publishing this with reading material of The Fall of Constantinople:
“The blood ran in rivers down the steep streets from the heights of Petra toward the Golden Horn.”
This is absolutely sickening:
30 May 2011
The choir’s founder and arts director, Mehmet Bajraktarevic, said he was very proud to be in ?stanbul for such an important occasion.
The Sultan Mehmed Fatih Ensemble, a Sarajevo-based choir, was at ?stanbul’s historic Aya ?rini Museum on May 29 to mark the 558th anniversary of the conquest of ?stanbul by the Ottomans in 1453, marking the end of the Byzantine era. The choir performed a number of ?lahis, or Muslim hymns, during the concert, which was organized by Turkey’s state-owned Turkish Radio and Television Corporation (TRT).
The choir’s founder and arts director, Mehmet Bajraktarevic, said he was very proud to be in ?stanbul for such an important occasion. “During my 35-year career, I’ve directed many concerts throughout Europe, but this is the most significant task that I have been given. I am honored that Sultan Mehmed Fatih was chosen to perform at Aya ?rini on such an important day in history. This is by far the ‘trophy of my career’,” he said, adding that he was delighted to have been invited to perform at Aya ?rini by TRT.
The performance at Aya ?rini marked Sultan Mehmed Fatih’s ninth appearance in Turkey in seven years. “We are always excited to perform in Turkey. We are respected here, and our talent is recognized. While in our own country, Bosnia, people are not interested in our choir, or our ?lahis. It saddens me, but it is a harsh reality,” Bajraktarevic said ruefully.
The choir director also shared information on the background of the choir. Formed in 2004, the ensemble is made up of nine pedagogues and 100 vocalists of varying age groups. “Sultan Mehmed Fatih has two generations of vocalists. We even have a mother and a daughter singing together,” Bajraktarevic said.
The choir was invited to perform on the anniversary of ?stanbul’s conquest, after the general director of TRT, ?brahim ?ahin, discovered the ensemble at a concert during a random visit to Bosnia. The ensemble is made up of different choirs from Bosnia and Turkey such as the Choir Dzulistan from Novi Pazar, Serbia. The ensemble’s popular repertoire consists of songs in several different languages, including Persian, Turkish, Bosnian and Arabic, with a unique blend of Western and Balkan influences and traditions.
Cihan news agency
We’re doomed…DOOMED I tell you! |
| January 4th, 2011 under Uncategorized. [ Comments: none ]
Is this really what they want to teach their snot-nosed little kid? You can have it your way all the time? Oh, sure, they say it’s to teach their kid what’s right:
"What they’re trying to do here is teach (their son) a life lesson, which simply is that you fight for what’s right," said Ron Frazier, the Haydens’ attorney. "This is classic David versus Goliath, and they want their son to understand that."
But you and I and everyone else here knows what it’s REALLY about, don’t we? (emphasis mine)
The Haydens are asking the court to force the schools to stop enforcing the team’s haircut policy and rule that it’s unconstitutional, as well as award any necessary damages to the family.
Hey, news flash for Patrick, Melissa and “A.H.” Hayden – the world aint Burger King, and you don’t always get it YOUR way. Get over it, buckle down and get with the program, or get the frak out and make room for people who don’t whine and moan and complain cause they have to cut their precious hair. The kid aint Samson, ok? Sheesh.
Lawsuit over Greensburg short-hair rule may be a long shot | The Indianapolis Star | IndyStar.com
For crying out loud! |
| January 4th, 2011 under Uncategorized. [ Comments: none ]
This is simply ridiculous. When did our fighting forces turn into a buncha whiney mamby-pamby cry-babies? So some lewd comments were made on the video, so some bad jokes were told. For crying out loud people, you’re SUPPOSED to be hardened warriors, prepared for harsh conditions of battle. But instead, you get all offended and go crying over some stupid sophomoric video.
Our grandfathers are weeping at what pussies we’ve become.
Navy to Likely Fire Commander for Lewd Videos – FoxNews.com
Sleight of Hand |
| December 29th, 2010 under Barack Hussein Obama, Conspiracies. [ Comments: none ]
Watch this hand over here, pay no attention to the other hand, or that man behind the curtain. For several years now, the
debate argument has raged on about whether Barak Hussein Obama was born on American soil.
The produced a ‘certification of live birth’ – which I guess differs from a certified birth certificate in some way. Birth certificates in the state of Hawaii are not public documents. This is not unusual, many states moved birth certificates out of the ‘public document’ domain years ago when they got wise to people getting birth certificates of dead folks and starting new lives under new names, all with a legal certified birth certificate.
In Kansas birth certificates are not public record either, but I can go down to the Department of Vital Statistics and get a certified copy of mine, complete with a State Seal of Authenticity. One has to wonder why BHO doesn’t do this. Hell, he’s there in Hawaii now, and the governor is vowing to prove once and for all that BHO was born on American soil.
Personally, I believe BHO was born on American soil, but they’re intentionally keeping the facts muddied as yet another distraction for what they are really trying to do.
« Previous entries