Si vos es validus ut lego is, vos es super erudio

Get Bigsibling bling and wares (more added soon!)
Crescent of Betrayal Blogroll
Archives
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
Topeka Bloggers

PPP Direct


Locations of visitors to this page
Auction Ads
Kansas Bloggers
David McSwane should learn a lesson here
September 30th, 2007 Academia, Censorship, Cry-Babies, Education, Free Speech

Everyone by now should know about David McSwane. He is the editor-in-chief of the student newspaper at Colorado State University up in Ft. Collins, CO. For those that don’t know, he is also the one who published an editorial in the newspaper which was four simple words “Tazer this, [unmentionable] Bush”.

This was, of course, in response to the tazering of a student in Florida who tried to ask Senator John Kerry un-agreeable questions in a question and answer forum. Forget for the moment that somehow President Bush is responsible for what happened to the Florida student who was asking questions of Sen. Kerry (I have been trying to figure that out, but somehow I just can’t connect the dots), and just focus on the editorial.

The CSU Board of Student Communications which oversees the newspaper is calling McSwane to the carpet. They feel he has violated the paper’s code of ethics, and are looking into firing him. McSwane, of course, is crying they are violating his First Amendment rights. Kids these days, they just don’t understand the term ‘ethics’, or ‘appropriateness’.

If McSwane were working for a real newspaper, in the real world, reporting real news, he would have been fired long before now. The editorial appears on 21 September, and here it is 30 September, a full nine days have passed and McSwane still has his job. In the real world, the Board of Directors or the owner of whatever paper he was working for would have sacked him the day it appeared.

This is just another in what is becoming a fairly long line of cases where students display poor judgment, then scream First Amendment when they are called on it. McSwane has to learn at some point in his life that decisions have consequences, and while he has a First Amendment right to say what he pleases, his employers have every right to can people who make the company look bad.

His unethical, immature use of foul language in a newspaper should not be tolerated if the newspaper wants to retain any credibility as a reporter of real news. That might be okay in a tabloid type paper, or something akin the Lampoon of Harvard, but not an official school newspaper.

source


Technorati Tags: , , , ,

   Stumble it!

Write a comment





Search bigsibling.com

Global Voices: The World is Talking, Are You Listening?
About
Bigsibling lives in northeastern Kansas with is wife and three children.

He works for a living and enjoys the fruits of his labors.

He is a contributing writer to Exposing 'Rev.' Sutter
Blogs I like to read (in no particular order)
Count Ramblings
Captain Dramatics's Mom
Foehammer's Anvil
Jihad Watch
Lady Predator
SoHos
Military Mom
Atlas Shrugs
All Aboard
Recent Posts
Recent Commentors
ADVERTS
Help a poor guy with a disabled wife and three kids. Please visit my sponsors!
Anti-PC Blogroll
Anti-PC League