The Bigsibling Blog

Canada. I’ve written some about the state of freedom in our neighbor to the north (or, to the east for those of you in Alaska). With the current kangaroo court called the Canadian Human Rights Council, which is trying its best to convict someone for writing about how, based on statistical numbers, Muslims in Europe with out-populate the natives there. They call that hate speech. Go figure.

Canada needs to change its name to ‘The People’s State of Canada’. Because that name better reflects what it is becoming. Just a few short months ago in Texas, the state moved in and seized some 400+ children from a polygamist compound. The grounds for this over-reaching and illegal maneuver was a falsified claim of abuse. What as abuse going on at the compound? Don’t know, maybe, but the state swept in and took all of these children from their parents in blanket KGB style fashion.

The People’s State of Canada must have looked at that woeful Texas incident, and been impressed. There are two kids up in Winnipeg, Manitoba up there in the People’s State of Canada who have a pair of complete losers for parents. Their parents are bigoted, white-supremacist racist pigs. And they, of course, are teaching this bile to their own kids.

Little did this couple know they were no longer living in a free state. Heck I don’t know for certain, maybe Canada was never really a free state to begin with. Although, the Canucks I have had dealings with in the past seemed perfectly normal. In addition, it doesn’t seem that our northern cousins are flocking to America to experience our free and open society. So I guess I just kind of assumed they were free, like we are. Ok, wait, I’m getting off track here. Back to the issue….

So the People’s State of Canada does not like that this couple are vile racist pigs, and determine that they should not be allowed to raise their own kids, and in KGB (or State of Texas – if you would rather) they sweep in and grab up the children and remove them from their parents, to be placed in state custody. The next hearing is set for 23 June.

This is outrageous, preposterous and many other *ous words that I can’t even think of right now. Now, sexual or physical abuse, or even extreme emotional abuse, yeah, yank the kids outta there without a second thought. But to remove these children from their parents because the People’s State of Canada does not like what the parents believe? Does not like who the parents associates with? How can the good people of Canada stand by and watch this oppression take place. In this day and age? After all we’ve seen in recent memory? After Hitler, after Stalin? After Tibet? After all of this, the people of Canada just sit back and say ‘oh well’?

I am appalled, as much by the silence of the Canucks, as I am by the actions of their government. I simply cannot understand how you all can sit back and watch something like this happen. Regardless of how despicable these parents are, regardless of what their own personal beliefs are. To take their children from them because of their ‘thoughts’. Wrong, just plain wrong. Oh sure, the line is drawn, if you have kids, and you think this way, we’ll take them from you. Funny thing about these types of lines though. They are not static. The never, ever stay in one location. And you people who are on the ’safe’ side of the line now, will one day find yourself on the wrong side of the line. What then?

I’ll close with a paraphrased version of Martin Niemoller’s poem:

When the People’s State of Canada came for the bigots,
I remained silent;
I was not a bigot.

When they took the children from the racists,
I remained silent;
I was not a racist.

When they muzzled the activists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a activist,

When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.

source

Stumble it!

The Danes require admiration and respect in this world. It should be recalled that it was newspapers in Denmark which had the cajones to print the now infamous “Mohamed” cartoons which gave cause to the patrons of the “Religion of Peace” to riot and demand the collective heads of the Danes (all in the name of peace, I am certain). Now, they have stepped up to the plate again and have offered State protection to one who is in danger, and not even one of their own.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali was a politician in the Netherlands in 2004. That same year Dutch television aired a short film titled “Submission.” The film was an exposé on the treatment of women in the Muslim world. For this film, a true believer of the Religion of Peach brutally murdered the filmmaker, Theo van Gogh. Attached to van Gogh’s lifeless corpse was a note threatening Ali. Since then the Dutch have offered her State protection. But recently the Dutch government removed that protection, leaving Ali exposed to the perpetrators of the Religion of Peace.

However, the Danes have stepped up and offered her protection so long as she lives in Denmark. Who could ask for more than that? This ladies own country won’t offer her protection, but the Danes will.

Read more about it over at Atlas Shrugs – and a lot more about the plight of the heroine Ayaan Hirsi Ali.

Technorati Tags: Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Religion of Peach, Theo van Gogh, Netherlands, Denmark

Stumble it!

A new policy proposed by the Blair government over there in Great Britain wants to mandate that all children are checked an monitored to see if they are at risk of committing crimes later in life.

The Government’s plan to prevent crime said: “Establish universal
checks throughout a child’s development to help service providers to
identify those most at risk of offending.

What would society do without the State to protect us from ourselves? Is there no longer any personal responsibility? With this type of program, not only is it extremely invasive, but criminals of the future can shirk their responsibility claiming that the State itself has determined that he would be a criminal. With a sentence like that hanging over one’s head, what is one expected to do?

source

Technorati Tags: Great Britain, nanny state, personal responsibility, crime

Stumble it!

The secularlists are at it again.  They are pressuring Philadelphia to punish the Boy Scouts of America for excercising the rights granted to them by the Constitution.  The Philly city council says since the Boy Scouts don’t accept homos as leaders or scouts, then they have to vacate the building that they have been operating out of since 1928.
ÂÂ
Here is the kicker, tell me if you find this at all ironic – back in 1928, the City of Philadelphia built the building, named the “Bruce S. Marks Scout Rescource Center” for the specific purpose of giving the Scouts a place of their own.  The Scouts have enjoyed the facilities rent-free.
ÂÂ
But, because they stand for moral values and dare to make moral judgements, the Scouts are penalized.  In a world that is increasingly dominated by the secularist ‘anything goes’ crowd, this is to be expected.  It rings of something that might have been written by Ayn Rand.

source

Stumble it!

The accuser is black, the accused are white.  Apperantly that makes an open and closed case for Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong.  From the beginning of this whole Duke university LaCross rape case, everything has been hinky.

Nifong did win re-election, and Bigsibling is would bet dollars to donuts part of that is because of his relentless pit-bull like attacks on the three Duke students a drunk stripper accused of raping her.

It now seems that back in May a private laboratory conducted DNA analysis on body fluids taken from the victim’s body and under garments.  Those results were never released to the public (at the request of Mr. Nifong).  It was, in fact, a cover up. 

The photo line up that Nifong used to have the victim identify her alleged attackers was faulty and not only did not follow Durham PD policies, but it was such a sham it violated any thinking person’s idea of being remotely fair.

Now it looks like the case against the innocent students will probably be dismissed (without a clear verdict of not guilty).  This is probably Nifong’s tactic from the beginning.  He knew there was no way these kids were guilty, and there was no way he could have won, so he creates a climate where the students would get off on a ‘technicality.’

Now he can claim that he wanted to prosecute the students but the lab messed up in reporting their results, and that is why the kids went free.  Not because they are obviously innocent.

source

Tech Tags: Nifong Durham Duke LaCross rape victim innocent guilty DNA conspiracy

Stumble it!