The Bigsibling Blog

Canada. I’ve written some about the state of freedom in our neighbor to the north (or, to the east for those of you in Alaska). With the current kangaroo court called the Canadian Human Rights Council, which is trying its best to convict someone for writing about how, based on statistical numbers, Muslims in Europe with out-populate the natives there. They call that hate speech. Go figure.

Canada needs to change its name to ‘The People’s State of Canada’. Because that name better reflects what it is becoming. Just a few short months ago in Texas, the state moved in and seized some 400+ children from a polygamist compound. The grounds for this over-reaching and illegal maneuver was a falsified claim of abuse. What as abuse going on at the compound? Don’t know, maybe, but the state swept in and took all of these children from their parents in blanket KGB style fashion.

The People’s State of Canada must have looked at that woeful Texas incident, and been impressed. There are two kids up in Winnipeg, Manitoba up there in the People’s State of Canada who have a pair of complete losers for parents. Their parents are bigoted, white-supremacist racist pigs. And they, of course, are teaching this bile to their own kids.

Little did this couple know they were no longer living in a free state. Heck I don’t know for certain, maybe Canada was never really a free state to begin with. Although, the Canucks I have had dealings with in the past seemed perfectly normal. In addition, it doesn’t seem that our northern cousins are flocking to America to experience our free and open society. So I guess I just kind of assumed they were free, like we are. Ok, wait, I’m getting off track here. Back to the issue….

So the People’s State of Canada does not like that this couple are vile racist pigs, and determine that they should not be allowed to raise their own kids, and in KGB (or State of Texas – if you would rather) they sweep in and grab up the children and remove them from their parents, to be placed in state custody. The next hearing is set for 23 June.

This is outrageous, preposterous and many other *ous words that I can’t even think of right now. Now, sexual or physical abuse, or even extreme emotional abuse, yeah, yank the kids outta there without a second thought. But to remove these children from their parents because the People’s State of Canada does not like what the parents believe? Does not like who the parents associates with? How can the good people of Canada stand by and watch this oppression take place. In this day and age? After all we’ve seen in recent memory? After Hitler, after Stalin? After Tibet? After all of this, the people of Canada just sit back and say ‘oh well’?

I am appalled, as much by the silence of the Canucks, as I am by the actions of their government. I simply cannot understand how you all can sit back and watch something like this happen. Regardless of how despicable these parents are, regardless of what their own personal beliefs are. To take their children from them because of their ‘thoughts’. Wrong, just plain wrong. Oh sure, the line is drawn, if you have kids, and you think this way, we’ll take them from you. Funny thing about these types of lines though. They are not static. The never, ever stay in one location. And you people who are on the ’safe’ side of the line now, will one day find yourself on the wrong side of the line. What then?

I’ll close with a paraphrased version of Martin Niemoller’s poem:

When the People’s State of Canada came for the bigots,
I remained silent;
I was not a bigot.

When they took the children from the racists,
I remained silent;
I was not a racist.

When they muzzled the activists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a activist,

When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.

source

Stumble it!

I feel bad for my kids. I really do. It has to suck to be a kid in this day and age. First, one learns in kindergarten they have to be wary of who they speak with and how they touch them. We have seen incidents where five year old kids are charged with sexual harassment because they give their kindergarten teacher a hug. Or because they give another school mate a hug or a peck on the cheek.

Add to this the fact that now, at Percy Julian Middle School in Oak Park, ILL kids are not even allowed to hug anyone on school grounds…at all….ever. Hugging, banned. I try to wrap my mind around this whole deal, but I am miserably failiing. The reason, according to the principal, is because some students were forming what she called “hugging lines” in the hallways, giving each other hugs and making it difficult for some kids to get through the hallways. Okay, sure, there is a problem there, but really, is banning hugs the answer? Sadly, Victoria Sharts (the principal – I don’t think, in this case, ‘your principal is your ‘pal’ really fits here), believes that people should only hug at airports and family renuions. That makes me sad, really. That this lady is so devoid of emotion and any kind of caring human contact that she feels hugs are inappropriate anywhere by an airport or family reunion. It makes me wonder how such a cold person could be in charge of a middle school.

In addition to the hugging thing, over to the left a bit, and down the map we look at Colorado Springs, CO. There, the elementary schools have banned the age old game of tag. Yes, that is correct, it is not unlawful to play tag at recess in Colorado Springs, CO. It seems that some kids that played tag, didn’t want to be chased. So instead of telling the kids “don’t play tag” they just ban the whole shebang. It is like the little girl several years back who was being charged with assault for hitting a kid with a ball while they were playing…dodgeball. If one doesn’t want to be hit with a ball, don’t play dodgeball. If one doesn’t want to be chased, don’t play tag. But instead of just telling the kid not to play tag, the make it so no one can play tag. I suppose that way the kid who didn’t like being chased doesn’t feel like an outsider. Heck no, they probably just feel ostracized now. I know what my kids are like. And if this had happened to them, the whiny cry-baby kid would certainly not be welcome in any other games played. They would go out of their way to keep away from him. After all, if the kid is slow, does that mean a foot race is no longer a valid option at recess?

And what, to many kids, is one of the greatest holidays of all time is under attack as well. The holiday where kids get loads of candy, don’t have to be good, don’t have to wait for some bearded fat man, and can wear a disguise. Yes, I’m speaking of Halloween. The Kohl Elementary School in Broomfield, CO (again with the Coloradoans – when I lived there, we used to joke that Colorado was being Californicated – I guess that is over and the Californicators have won) has eliminated their Halloween celebration. In its place is – you guessed it – a “Fall Festival”. What the heck is a Fall Festival? And why are we celebrating the Fall? What does the Fall do that is so special it requires a festival? My guess is, some dimwitted parents of some kid complained that Halloween – for whatever reason – was simply inappropriate. So, in order to be ‘inclusive’ the school scraps Halloween, and replaces with this some crap festival. It seems to me it would have been better to just scrap the whole thing altogether. Not have any celebration in the fall. It isn’t like the kids are not going to celebrate Halloween anyway. They are still going to dress up in costumes and go trick or treating. They are still going to stay up light on 31 October eating way too much candy. The only thing this accomplishes is 1) kids don’t get to wear their costumes to school and 2) teachers have to come up with some lame excuse as to why they are having a great big party on 5 Oct.

No way. For all those who think they would like a second go ’round at youth, you can have it, I don’t want it. When I was a kid, we ran the neighborhood. In school we played tag, and dodgeball, and we had schoolyard fights. And you know what? Never were the police called. Not once was a kid arrested or accused or charged with anything. Usually we ended up in the principal’s office. And later that night we would end up on the wrong side of dad’s belt. But today? No way Jose. I’ll leave the mess that is childhood today to the kids.

Technorati Tags: Broomfield Colorado, Colorado Springs, Oak Park Illinois, childhood, youth, elemtary school, middle school, grade school

Stumble it!

The problem with so-called hate crimes is, that almost every crime can be construed as a hate crime. The problem with that is, when nearly every crime is a hate crime, the heinousness that the label of ‘hate crime’ is supposed to portray, becomes watered down. It gets to the point (and I think we are arriving there pretty fast) where there are so many actions – many terribly minor – that are classified as ‘hate crimes’ that people just quit thinking of a ‘hate crime’ as something particularly heinous.

Case in point, Tabitha Vandyke, a PetSmart employee and a lesbian. Some numb-nuts wrote “die [expletive]” on the inside of her locker at work. The police, of course, are calling it a hate crime. Now, sure, it was insensitive, offensive, rude and vandalism…but a hate crime? Whatever.

Another case in point, one or more numb-nuts ran around a Hartford, Conn neighborhood creating graffiti on peoples’ cars and garages. Some of the symbols scribbled were swastikas. Now the police are investigating it as a hate crime. It doesn’t appear that any one person, or type of person was targeted for this graffiti spree, but what the heck, let’ all jump on the hate crime bandwagon and call it that.

It is incidents like these (and there are plenty) that weaken the whole idea of a ‘hate crime’. It is incidents like these that will mean the demise of what the designation of ‘hate crime’ was supposed to be. Simply calling someone a name, or displaying a horrible symbol is not a hate crime people.

Technorati Tags: Hate Crimes, Racism

Stumble it!

I have some ’splainin to do here. First off, this is my blog. I own it. I devise the content for it. I pay the server space to house it. I supply the database that drives it. I have invested time and effort and little money in this baby. I like this blog. The reason this blog exists is because this beaner has opinions and ideas, and he wants to voice them. That is the beauty of the internet. The little guy is no longer silenced, but can be heard by many, many peoples of all walks of life.

What this blog is NOT is a forum for personal grievances, vendettas or other attacks. This is not a place where I will allow one visitor to maliciously demean and launch personal attacks against another visitor. With that in mind, I have been exchanging emails with a visitor who’s comment on a post I have not allowed to be posted. The comment follows:

[NAME REMOVED], has your psychiatrist been in touch with you yet? He’s looking for you, something about they released you too soon. Apparently only spending one year in that psychiatric unit wasn’t enough. I gave him your home address, I’m sure it won’t be long till the men in the white coats are knocking at your door – again.

Maybe I am just over sensitive. But this type of stuff I will not allow. It is unnecessary, and it’s only purpose is to try and cause emotional distress against one of my visitors. What is also disturbing about this post, is the reference to her “home address.” The poster seems to me to be maybe a little unstable – maybe not – but if he has this kind of hatred for her, and has her home address, who knows? The email exchange is below:

—————————- Original Message —————————-
Subject: Re: You comment at The Bigsibling Blog
From: bigsibling at bigsibling dot com
Date: Wed, June 13, 2007 9:24 am
To: [NAME REMOVED]
————————————————————————–

Here is the difference [NAME REMOVED], when she posted her criticism of you, she supplied her opinion and supporting links. Whereas you merely lashed out with a personal attack. I cannot control that you believe she ‘cyberstalks’ you.

Now, I fully understand, and even expect you to not grasp the almost, but not quite, completely unsubtle differences between her comment and your response.

I have no problem with people who disagree with me, and their comments and responses are more than welcome. But demeaning personal attacks are not welcome when launched against my visitors.

You can attack me all you want. Believe me, this beaner has seen more hatred directed against my people than you have killed terrorists (which, according to you, is quite a lot).

Again, I will not allow you to direct personal attacks against my visitors using my bandwidth, my database and my storage.

Thank you for visiting, and I certainly hope you continue to visit and leave comments.

=Bigsibling

[NAME REMOVED] is my cyberstalker. She’s all over the net, trashing me,
you allow this, yet you fail to allow me to respond to her. Most sites
have banned her.

[NAME REMOVED]
[LOCATION REMOVED]
Serving God and Country
http://[LINK REMOVED]
http://[LINK REMOVED]

—– Original Message —-
From: “bigsibling at bigsibling dot com”
To: [NAME REMOVED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 8:59:07 AM
Subject: You comment at The Bigsibling Blog

[NAME REMOVED],

I am deleting the message you left for [NAME REMOVED] at my blog
(http://www.bigsibling.com) because if you want to pick a fight with her,
or otherwise spew your hatred of her, please do so on your own blog, or in
her forums (http://[LINK REMOVED]). My blog is not the place to air
and/or resolve personal grievances.

But thanks for visiting! I do appreciate anyone who stops by.

=Bigsibling

To be certain, I have contacted the person this attack was directed against, and let her know about his post – which I can certainly see as a veiled threat (mentioning her home address and people coming to her door and what-not).

Oh, and I’ll update this post if new emails are exchanged. Just so everything it out and in the open. I have removed names, email and website addresses.

Thanks for stopping by.

Technorati Tags: Cyber-bullies, bullies, honor, respect, comments, blogs

Stumble it!

Photo of Greensburg aftermath stolen from the Associated Press (thanks in advance or not suing me!)

Greensburg, Kansas. For those who have had their heads in a hole, this was the town that, on Friday night, was wiped off the face of the earth by a 1.7 mile wide category EF-5 tornado with reported winds of over 200 miles per hour. That is faster than most NASCAR drivers travel.

Yesterday Kathleen Sebelius, the governer of Kansas was complaining about how there aren’t enough National Guard troops and equipment in Kansas to send proper aid to the folks in Greensburg because they are all in Iraq and Afganistan.

This morning on CNN, Gov. Kathleen Sebelius (D) said that the state is missing vital National Guard equipment because of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Usually the state has approximately 70-80 percent of its equipment at any given time, but it currently has just 40-50 percent. She added that these shortages “will just make it [recovery] that much slower.”

This sounds horrendous – unless you hear from the folks of Greensburg themselves.

Only hours after the town was flattened, [state senator Tim] Huelskamp said, people were already griping – not because the government wasn’t there with its porta-potties, but because they were there and in the way.

In Greensburg, the ‘first responders’ were not the federal government, or the state government, or the Red Cross, or Salvation Army or anyone else. In Greensburg, the ‘first-responders’ were the citizens of Greensburg, and those from neighboring towns, farms and ranches.

By the time any official government response was sent, the streets of Greensburg were already cleared. People were already being moved and cared for. The neighboring towns sent buses and cars and trucks with winches. They cleared the streets and accounted for everyone. Then the official first responders showed up and kept the good townsfolk of Greensburg et al. from doing what needed to be done.

“It’s a very unique situation,” she [Sharon Watson of the Kansas Emergency Management Office] explained. “It’s not like Katrina. The scale is smaller, but with Katrina, you still had something left. Here – it’s hard to comprehend, but here there is nothing. It’s a complete loss. So we have to make sure it’s safe.”

Well, just what would we do without the government around to protect us from ourselves? It seems to me the good folks of Greensburg had a handle on the situation, and the KEMO people should have sat back and watched and taken notes so they would know what to do in the future.

Yes, Greensburg, Kansas will be rebuilt. And it will cost the tax payers of the United States much less per capita than it would had this happened on either of the coasts. This is because the people who live in Greensburg are Kansans. They built the town the first time without any assistance from good ol’ Uncle Sam, and they’ll do it again. The folks of Greensburg still maintain the independent pioneer spirit that built this nation. The folks of Greensburg still buy into the John Wayne spirit. The rest of the nation could take a lesson from the good people of Greensburg, Kansas.

sources:
Netscape News – Sebelius: Iraq War Is Slowing National Guard’s Tornado Response
National Review Online – Blown Away?

Technorati Tags: Greensburg, Kansas, Tornado, Government, Response, Citizens, Neighbors

Stumble it!

Why are people so surprised? When kids and others do bad, morally reprehensible things, why is there such surprise? Is this not exactly where society has been heading? When we, as a society, remove any moral code, when we claim anything can be justified, people will do bad things. There is nothing standing in the way to stop them. There are all sorts of stories, examples can be found here, and here, and here. These are just a sampling of the things people do. What astounds me is how people are so surprised at these actions.

In a world where we have removed any moral absolutes, where we have allowed the flimsiest of excuses to justify immoral behavior. Where society sends such mixed signals to its inhabitants, how can people be so shocked? When we let child rapists spend less than a year in jail because pedophilia is a ’sickness’, there by excusing the criminal for the crime.

Over the past several decades, society has lost its moral compass. Society says it is OK for people to do whatever they want as long as it can be somehow justified. In a discussion I had with a pure leftist, he was lamenting that society has let its moral compass go, but in the same breath declared there were no moral absolutes. I asked him about having sex with a 10 year old. He declared the act reprehensible, but if you were a mormon, and that was your belief, then it was ok. It is this kind of attitude, this kind of, anything-goes-as-long-as-you-can-justify-it mentallity that has driven people like the kid in Lewiston, Mn that threw a ham steak at some Muslim kids at his school. This is nuts. This should not have happened. This kid should have had the moral training that prevented this kind of behavior. This is stupidity in search of a crime. I can’t seem to equate a ham steak with a crime. Stupid, yes. Ignorant, yes. Prejudice, maybe. Offensive, definitely. Hateful? Probably not.

Kids are kids, they will be kids, they will always be mean and cruel. They were when I was in school, and they are now as my kids are in school. Kids tease people who are different. It is a fact of life. Kids pick on those that let themselves be picked on. It is the Darwinian nature of things. Survival of the fittest. For people who love the whole evolution thing, we, as a society, try to balk that trend every chance we get.

That is the culture we have raised them in. In the past 20 – 30 years kids have been told it is okay to behave the way you want to behave. We, as a society, are preaching that there are no moral absolutes. Wrong is not always wrong. If a kid does something bad, it is not his fault, but the fault of his environment, or his ADD or some other excuse. Wrong answers are not marked in red because it may damage self esteem.

With no moral right and wrongs, how is a kid to know that showing disrespect to their fellow students is wrong? We have brought these kids up with a belief that punishment for bad behavior is unacceptable. In a society that has misplaced its moral compass. We don’t teach kids morals any longer. So now, that kids have no morals, we are surprised when they behave immorally?

What I am getting at is that, as a society, we have gotten into the habit of not teaching kids any morals. Of not explaining basic courtesies, of not teaching them politeness. Society has found it acceptable that allowing kids to ‘grow into themselves’ is proper. Society has deemed it proper that girls should be called ‘hos’ and that there is noting wrong with advocating the destruction of human life. Society has found it ok for people to molest children and receive six month prison sentences. This is a societal problem. The general disregard for one’s fellow man.

And yes, there are absolute morals. There is such a thing as absolute right and wrong. There are actions that are wrong under any and all circumstances. By claiming there are no absolute morals, one is simply giving into, and feeding the contingents of society that want no moral judgments on anyone, anytime. But when a kid shows a piece of ham to a Muslim, well that is just morally wrong.

Can one see the dilemma here? Does one not get the contradictions in all of this? There are no moral absolutes…well, except for showing ham to a Muslim.

People say these things are reprehensible, but if one believes in living life that way, that makes it ok. This sends mixed messages. It is not OK to rape someone, unless you believe it is OK. It is not ok to have sex with a 10 year old, unless your are a Mormon, then it is OK.

Society at large sends these mixed messages, saying it is OK in insult Christians, but not OK to insult Muslims. It is OK for Mel Gibson to slam Jews, but not OK for Dom Imus to slander basketball players. It is OK for Carlos Mencia to say nigger, but not OK for Michael Richards. I find it astounding that people would be surprised by the actions of this kid with the ham steak, given that they don’t believe there is any action that is inherently wrong, as long as there are explanations or excuses to justify that action.

And yes, it does start with parents. Parents who were raised with a lackadaisical attitude to morality and absolute right and wrong, and who are perpetrating that same attitude, and more so, with their children. Parents who believe that anything is OK if it is only justified, and that anything can be justified with enough newpseak and explaining and stretching.

There are moral absolutes, because one refuses to see them does not make them not there.

Technorati Tags: Morality, Society, Culture, Moral Compass, Moral Absolutes

Stumble it!

John “Do as I say, not as I do” Edwards is suddenly a devout Christian?  I don’t get it.  He is up there on beliefenet.com whining about how Jesus would be disappointed…nay…appalled by the lack of charity in America?  I’m sorry, what America is he talking about?  His America, or the one the rest of us normal, every day, down to earth folks live in?

“I think that Jesus would be disappointed in our ignoring the plight of those around us who are suffering and our focus on our own selfish short-term needs. I think he would be appalled, actually.”

If I were the interviewer at beliefnet.com, I would not be able to continue after that statement without querying him about his palatial 28,000 + square foot estate in Orange County, NC.  If he so believes that Americans need to give more to the poor, the downtrodden, the helpless, why is he not leading by example?  How many homeless will he be housing in his new crib?

I think Jesus would be appalled that he has so much more than most of America, yet he gives (percentage wise) probably less than the rest of us.  I think it was Jesus that said, when someone asked Him how to get into heaven, to sell all of his belongings, give the money to the poor and follow Him.  I believe it was also Jesus that made the statement that it was easier to get a Camel through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to get to heaven.  And I believe it was Jesus who praised the old woman who gave one alm saying to those around that were laughing at her meager gift that she gave more than all the others combined because she gave all she had.  This is what Jesus would want of us.  Granted, I don’t think very many people reach that ideal (I know that I do not).

Face it, Edwards is a putz, who preaches about how greedy middle America is, but won’t part with one dime more than is necessary to limit his tax liability. 

“I think he [Jesus] would be happy with the fact that I have focused on people who live in poverty here…”

Really?  How many poor people does he invite to BBQs at that palace of his?

“I do believe in the separation of church and state. But I don’t think separation of church and state means you have to be free from your faith.”

If one examines Mr. Edwards answers, might they begin to see some patterns?  Why would one want to be free from their faith?  Should not one’s faith free them from the trials and tribulations normally associated with life on earth?  Unless they feel bound, or enslaved by their faith.  Might that not mean that Mr. Edwards is using this while faith thing as a means to an end and that he does not truly believe in it, has, in fact, very little faith, and feels trapped, enslaved or ensnared by his ‘faith’?

“But, by the time I was in middle school/high school, we were solidly in the middle class. And now I’ve had everything you could ever have financially in this country. And so, I feel some responsibility myself to help and give back, to give that opportunity to lots of people who I don’t think have it today. That’s part of it. And it also comes from my faith. If you took every reference to taking care of the least of these out of the Bible, there would be a pretty skinny Bible. And I think I as a Christian, and we as a nation, have a moral responsibility to do something about this.”

Ummm…again…a SIX MILLION DOLLAR HOUSE!  His house cost as much as two bionic legs, a bionic arm and a bionic eye PLUS rehab for Steve Austin.  And one would think, that with 28,000 square feet, he could spare some space to give shelter to a couple of homeless folks

“And so, you know, I come from a very modest place and I’ve done well and we have a very nice physical structure. It’s completely unimportant. What matters is what happens inside that structure.”

Okay, the house is completely unimportant, then why spend six million dollars on it?  Why not get a more modest house and give the rest to the poor he claims to care so much about?  Don’t get me wrong.  If I had his money, I’d have a place just as big, and maybe even bigger.  I do not begrudge Edwards his palace even a little bit.  It is the hypocrisy that gets me all riled up.  It is his living in his palatial estate, and telling me, who makes less in a year working my arse off, then he makes in a week on interest alone, that I’m not doing enough for the poor.  Well kiss my Puerto Rican [bad word].

The whole interview just oozes with contempt and hypocrisy.  And the interviewer, David Kuo, gives Edwards a pass on everything!  Gives him a pass on the rhetoric about how America is greedy and won’t help the poor (all the while the liberals want to raise our taxes so we have LESS money with which to help the poor), yet will spend more money that most Americans will make in their lifetime on a house – instead of using the money to help the poor.  I wonder if he believes he is part of that greedy, non-poor helping America.  Kuo also gives him a pass on the hiring, and subsequent non-firing, of two vitriolic anti-Christian bloggers.  Granted, if Edwards wants them on his staff, that is his choice, and what they write is their choice, but he must accept whatever comes of it.  Kuo, however, simply dismisses all of the doublespeak and hypocrisy and promotes Edwards as a devout Christian.

I simply can’t give Kuo’s opinion about anything any credit with an interview, and the subsequent follow-up in his blog, that is so apologetic of Edward’s hypocrisy.

sourcing:
John Edwards: ‘My Faith Came Roaring Back’
Is John Edwards for real?
Edwards Home County’s Largest

Technorati Tags: John Edwards, Beliefnet.com, hypocrisy, house, poor, charity

Stumble it!

This can’t be for real. A teach in Virginia (natch!) likes to get naked, cover himself with paint, and roll around on a canvas creating ‘art.’ A video of him doing this weird act was distributed to his students via the YouTube.

How did the video make it to YouTube? How else? I can only assume the perv teacher uploaded it himself.

What teacher in their right mind would believe that his ability to teach and demand respect from his students would not be impeded after this?

source

Stumble it!

Oh for Pete’s sake! James Pacenza likes to get his groove on in sex chat rooms. That is what gets him going. Good for him. Lots of people like to hit the sex chat rooms and do a little ‘cyber sex’ (do they still call it that?) now and again. Nothing wrong with that in my opinion. What two consenting adults do over the ‘Net is their business and not really the business of anyone else.

But Jimmy “The Perv” Pacenza thinks that IBM should not fire him for wasting his workday in the sex chats. He thinks that IBM needs to give him counseling for his “Internet addiction.” What a putz this guys is. “Hey, I’m not going to work, but you have to pay me AND give me counseling. And while I’m waiting for he counseling sessions to actually work, I’m going to putt around in the sex chat rooms instead of doing the job you hired me to do.”

source

Stumble it!

KUDOS to Mr. Anderson Chandler, who recently awarded a $15,000 cash donation to the Jayhawk Area Council of the Boy Scouts of America.  Chandler is the Chairman and President of the Fidelity Bank & Trust in Topeka, KS (where Jayhawk Area Council is located – oddly enough).

It’s folks like Mr. Chandler that give our youth a fighting chance.  Remember, the younguns of today, are the leaders of tomorrow.  And no matter that the anti-American ACLU says, Boy Scouts teaches honor, reverence, respect and all those great things we as Americans would like to see in our young, and expect of our leaders.

Thanks again Mr. Chandler!

source

And thank you for visiting!

Tech Tags: cash donation topeka Boy Scouts Jayhawk Area Council

Stumble it!

« Previous entries